Alice Law and The Relativity Theory

Chapter 1

What is Alice Law?

Obtaining (c+v) (c-v) mathematics for the relativity theory

Han Erim

February 22, 2011

What is Alice Law?

Alice Law is exactly what the Relativity Theory is. It is different from Albert Einsteins relativity theory, both logically and mathematically.

First of all, I would like to mention a couple of basic notions.

What is Relativity?

 Relativity is the deformations occurring on electromagnetic interaction, depending on the presence of the limit value of c velocity of light, which is a universal constant.

Relativity mutually occurs on reference systems. There has to be a speed difference between the reference systems in order for relativity to take place. The volume of the impact is parallel with speed difference.

With Alice Law, the necessity of making a distinction between General Relativity and Special Relativity for the Relativity Theory has disappeared. However, I will provide their definitions here so that they are perceived.

What is Special Relativity?

Special Relativity studies the electromagnetic interactions between reference systems which move without being influenced by force impact. For instance, the relativity impacts observed between two reference systems which move linearly relative to each other are topics within the context of Special Relativity.

What is General Relativity?

If Special Relativity is handled together with force impacts, this means General Relativity. For example, the electromagnetic waves reaching us from a star are transmitted under the impact of gravitational force; therefore the impact of gravitational force must be taken into account while interpreting the interaction.

The Relativity Theory actually consists of a generalization made after force impact is added to Special Relativity Theory.

In my previous works, I may have defined the concepts above in different ways. For instance, I used to think that General Relativity had a wider scope. Please take it normally. Alice Law has evolved in time and many concepts have fallen into place in time. What I have written above states the thoughts I have for the moment.

Obtaining (c+v) (c-v) mathematics for the Relativity Theory

Alice Law has been built on a basic physics phenomenon which we all know. That phenomenon is:

REFERENCE POINT: Think of a box with a light source in the middle. When the lamp is lit, light beams reach the front and rear sides of the box simultaneously. Whether the box is in motion or not does not change this situation. Lets assume that there is an observer in the box. Whatever the speed of the box is, the observer always gets c (speed of light constant) when he measures the speed of the light beams travelling towards the walls of the box. (Figure 1) The paragraph above is an outcome which our present physics knowledge show us. I name this paragraph as REFERENCE POINT with the aim of using it in forthcoming chapters.

Alice Law bases itself on the assumption that the phenomenon described above is true.
Therefore, if it is necessary to mention the theoretical foundation of Alice Law, it is only possible in the paragraph above. A series of proof based on this theoretical foundation formulates Alice Law. For this reason, please do not evaluate Alice Law within the concept of a theory. Alice Law is definitely not a theory.

I would like to draw your attention to two issues on the REFERENCE POINT. First, please be careful that no force was mentioned while talking about the movement of the box. This is what I meant by saying that force concept does not exist in the mentality of Special Relativity theory. Second, as the phenomenon was described, it was emphasized that the lamp is in the centre of the box. There is AO=OB equation. We should also be careful about the presence of this equation.

Now, lets tear the box into two equal pieces longitudinally, and assume that we also cut the lamp in the centre and its wires. Lets move those box pieces mutually as illustrated in the figure. Let a beam of light shine when the cut wires of the lamp touch each other. In this case, light beams will simultaneously arrive at the front and rear walls of each piece of box. In this stage, we see an interesting situation taking place, as when the moment at which the light beams reach the sides is taken into consideration, the pieces of box are on different coordinates according to our reference system (represented by the eye in the figure). Obviously, we cannot claim that the light beams travel at c speed according to our reference system. Lets assume that there is an observer in each piece of box. Taking the reference point as basis, we know that the observers will calculate the speed of the light travelling to the sides as c. From this point of view, we have the following conclusion: If the speed of the box pieces is v according to our system, the speed values of the light beams travelling towards the walls of the boxes must be c+v or c-v for us, depending on the direction towards which a box travels. (Animated figure 1)

We see that light has a unique way of behaviour which has not yet been described by physics and this behaviour has defined a different mathematics for the behaviour of light.

In the example above, the source of light was left in the boxes. Now, lets have a similar event by taking the source of light out of the boxes. Lets use two identical boxes. Assume that there is an observer standing in the center of each box. We will place the sources of light and the boxes at both sides on the ground as seen in the figure. Lets utilize the principle of symmetry in order to have a decent reasoning process. Let our reference system (the eye) be on symmetry axis. Assume that the events occurring on the left or the right of the symmetry axis are always simultaneous and equal according to our reference frame. Lets move the boxes towards the symmetry axis in the center from both sides (Animated figure 2).

In this stage, asking the following question will reveal Special Relativity theory with all of its details: At which moment should the lights be turned on so that the observers in the boxes will see that both lights are turned on simultaneously?

Please be careful, the REFERENCE POINT shows us that in order for the observers to see the lights are turned on simultaneously, the light beams must reach both sides of the boxes at the same time. That is, in order to come to a conclusion, the question "Where do the light beams reach the sides of the boxes?" must also be answered. Adopting classical mechanics or Albert Einsteins Special Relativity mathematics does not provide us with consistent answers to these questions. The answer is not in the physics knowledge of our day.

The question has only one answer and it is again provided by the REFERENCE POINT. The lights must be turned on when AO=OB equation is maintained for the observers. In other words, the observers must be equally far from the lamps when they are turned on. There is only one coordinate point that maintains this condition: the lights must be turned on when the observers reach the symmetry axis. This answer is also valid for the question where do the light beams reach the sides of the boxes?. The observers see the light beams simultaneously if the lights are turned on this way. At the moment of seeing, one of the observers is on the right of the symmetry axis, while the other is on the left. We already know that when each observer measures the speed of light travelling towards his own reference system, he will find it to be c. If we name the speed value of the boxes as v, we can make the relevant calculations. It can be seen here that the solution is provided by (c+v) (c-v) mathematics again. Also, please be careful that the solution is independent from the length and the speed values of the boxes. The fact that there is a single solution offers a proof.

This proof is for the existence of (c+v) (c-v) mathematics for the behaviour of light. This mathematics is the new mathematics of relativity theory at the same time.

The necessity that the observers must be on the symmetry axis when the lights are turned on is something impossible for Einsteins physics, anyway. I dont like saying this, but I have to state it here again. The proof here completely terminates the Special Relativity theory by Albert Einstein, and all of its conclusions.

You can find many publications in aliceinphysics.com which investigates this proof thoroughly.

Relativity Of Simultaneously (The Main Proof of Alice Law),

Relative Velocity Of Light  (The Final Proof of Alice Law),

Tube

Time Travel (Alice Law Version 5),

The studies above are my publications dealing with this proof. You can also find publications on this issue in Alice Law Version 3 and Alice Law Version 4.

What is to be done for the behaviour of light after having obtained (c+v) (c-v) mathematics is to investigate the outcomes of this mathematics. In short, relativity is nothing other than the outcomes of this mathematics. In the forthcoming chapters of this article series, I will discuss the outcomes of Alice Law respectively. You dont have to wait for these new publications, of course. You can find many essays on Alice Law and the outcomes of (c+v) (c-v) mathematics on my website. However, please remember to check here, too. The issues I will cover in this article series will be more compact and will constitute a stronger integrity.

Establish: December 2001