THE BIG MISTAKE IN PHYSICS

In the past, while building the Electromagnetic Theory, a very important aspect was overlooked. Due to the resulting deficiency, the Electromagnetic Theory cannot accurately describe the electromagnetic interaction between reference systems in relative motion. Here, I will show you clearly where this mistake lies.

THE BALL AND THE LAMP
After pressing the play button, drag the lamp with your mouse. As we will see, the lights from the lamp follow the straight line connecting the lamp's position at that moment to the ball and reach the ball. This is repeated for every light from the lamp. If we say the speed of light coming towards the ball is always c according to the reference frame of the ball, then we have completed explaining the event.

Is this animation correct? Of course, it is. As far as we know, there is no other possibility. All our knowledge supports this animation.

HOWEVER, I HAVE AN OBJECTION HERE. I will explain my objection in the next animation.

WHAT IS MY OBJECTION?
To better observe the event, I created this animation so that the lights going towards the ball are emitted one by one. When one light reaches the ball, another starts its journey. Let's start the animation and continue dragging the light with the mouse.

My question here is: WHAT IS THE RELATIVE SPEED OF THE LIGHT GOING TOWARDS THE BALL AND THE LAMP?

We clearly see in this animation that the relative speed of the lamp and the light is not c and cannot be c. You can even do this: drag the lamp in the same direction and at the same speed as the light going towards the ball. In this case, the relative speed of the light and the lamp can even be zero.

You might think, "Alright, yes, you're right, the speed of the lights relative to the lamp is not c, so what?" But thinking this doesn't solve the problem. Because the problem lies within physics itself and is very serious. According to the Theory of Relativity, the speed of light relative to all reference systems must be c. That is, according to the Theory of Relativity, the relative speed of light and the lamp is c, and nothing can change this.

Let's assume for a moment that they are right. But do I not have the right to ask this question? Have you measured the speed of light going towards a moving target? Did you measure it and then answer me? NO, THIS MEASUREMENT HAS NEVER BEEN DONE. YOU DID NOT DO IT.

Therefore, the statement "the speed of light and the lamp relative to each other is always c" is nothing but an assumption. While laying the foundations of Electromagnetic Theory in the past, all necessary measurements were not made, and the decision was made that "this should probably be so." This decision has no connection with reality. Today's physicists have accepted this assumption as their truth without testing or verifying it and have continued it to this day. This is the matter.

Why is measuring the speed of light towards a moving target important?

Galileo's principle of relativity states: Let's consider two reference systems in relative motion to each other. From the perspective of physical laws, it does not matter which of these two reference systems is moving or stationary. The resulting outcome must be identical in every respect.

Here, Galileo's principle of relativity has been applied to the previous animation.
In the white-bordered section;
Above, the lamp is moving, and the ball is stationary.
Below, the lamp is stationary, and the ball is moving.

When the animation is played, we see that the outcomes of both scenarios are completely identical when compared moment by moment.

Since we have ensured equality with Galileo's principle of relativity, let's consider the lower situation. If a stationary light source sends its light to a moving target, the relative speed of the light source and the light it emits will not be c. Thus, we have understood how to perform the measurement. Measuring the speed of a signal sent from a stationary source to a moving target will lead us to the correct information.

The idea that "the speed of light must be c for all reference systems" is incorrect. You can continue to believe this, but you don't stand a chance. When the measurement is made, Alice's Law and (c+v) (c-v) mathematics will definitely prevail.

It is also necessary to understand that the foundations of Electromagnetic Theory were laid in the 1850s (Maxwell). Albert Einstein wrote the Theory of Relativity in the 1900s. At that time, even if you wanted to, you couldn't perform such a measurement. Even today, the number of universities capable of conducting this measurement is fewer than the fingers on your hand. So, let's leave the past behind and see what we can do today.

Move yourself to Alice's Law as soon as possible. The future of physics is within Alice's Law. The animations you will see here are animations describing what physics will look like in the future. I kindly ask you to watch them carefully.