I’d like you to know that Alice Law has developed and matured in time. Its development is full of ups and downs; there are thresholds and stages. If you get curious and read my old publications, you may notice some points that are not in line with what is told in this book. I’m not updating my old publications according to the new information that I get. I neither have the time or the financial situation for that opportunity. Besides, as these publications are studies that show the development of Alice Law in time, I think it is correct to keep them in their original form.

Alice Law has put me through very difficult thought processes many times. My first publications about Alice Law started with the year 2000. For a long time, I had considered Alice Law as an alternative theory of relativity based on (c+v) (c-v) mathematics. I was able to understand that Alice Law represented The Electromagnetic Theory at the end of an extremely challenging transition period between 2008 and 2013. In the publication Alice Law Version 7 that I published in 2012, it can be seen that the transition started but wasn’t concluded. In terms of thoughts, the absolute transition to The Electromagnetic Theory and the complete exclusion of The Theory of Relativity took place after 2015.

There are a lot of differences in terms of terminology between the old and the new studies. For example, in Alice Law Version 6, which I published in 2009, I used the word “Ghost” instead of “Image Object” and also “Spring” instead of “Source Object”. You can come across many examples similar to these. Even the description of Alice Law has changed a few times in line with its development from the past to present.

With the completion of the transition to The Electromagnetic Theory, I think Alice Law has reached a settled and consistent structure. But, after all, Alice Law is an extremely dynamic topic and it is in continuous development. Even the things that are written in this book can develop and change. However, we must know this for sure that Alice Law was born with (c+v) (c-v) mathematics and there has been no change in its mathematics since its birth. Changes have always taken place as the inclusion of new topics to Alice Law and as laying the way open for Alice Law a bit more. The most striking example to this is the inclusion of the topic of Doppler Shift to Alice Law in 2009. Minor changes, on the other hand, are generally about the correction of the terminology and the revision of old topics in the light of new information. In fact, I guess it wouldn’t be wrong to say that all these changes took place on me rather than on Alice Law. I understood Alice Law better as the time passed, better saw to what it extends, and started to explain it in a much better way.

The majority of my publications of the website are about (c+v) (c-v) mathematics. Since I thought that Alice Law was an alternative theory of relativity in the past, all the studies I published under the title of Special Relativity are about (c+v) (c-v) mathematics.

I also published some studies which I think were in the scope of the topic of General Relativity. You can frequently find these kinds of studies especially in Alice Law Version 3, 4, 5, and 6. I’d like to ask you to consider them as trial studies that do not bear certainty. Maybe one day I’ll have the chance to compile those works, too.

Return to table of contents

Previous chapter: The length of a field never changes

Next chapter: Milestones in (c+v) (c-v) mathematics