Language

31.1. FORMING REASON OF (C+V) (C-V) MATHEMATICS - FIELDS

I personally think that fields are special structures that belong to sub-elements such as electrons, protons, and quarks that make up an atom and that are natural components of those sub-elements. As a matter of fact, I know nothing about the topic of fields. However, this is not a case peculiar to me. There are a lot of researchers who think it exists, but no one can say consistently what it is. Therefore, I will deal with the Field Conception in a very general way and based on atoms. The important thing for me is to show you how (c+v) (c-v) mathematics is formed. And I can only show this with the help of atoms and their fields, and here I’m going to do that. I will carry you to where (c+v) (c-v) mathematics brought me by guiding you. 

I’ll start with two main arguments:

  1. Am I wrong to say “Each atom has its own field.”? Since an atom can apply gravitational forces to other atoms, if we, in principle, accept that force is transferred through fields, it is a consistent sentence in itself. 

  2. Am I wrong to say “The length of a field of an atom extends to infinity.”? This wouldn’t be wrong, either, because, in the Universal Gravitational Force equation, there is no limit to the distance at which objects can apply gravitational forces to each other.

If we collect what has been said in a figure, we obtain a model structure like the one below. There is the atom in the center. The field of the atom surrounds it like a sphere. 

When we generalize two arguments mentioned above, a universe structure that is made up of atoms and its fields. Fields of atoms fill in the emptiness called space. The mathematical meaning of it is this: If our universe is made up of 1081 atoms, any point in space is under the effect of 1081 fields. Each atom in space is inside other fields that belong to other atoms and each is exposed to a force applied by n = 1081 – 1 atoms. As can be seen, we at least obtained a mathematical model compatible with gravitational force mechanism.

Let’s improve our model a little. There was an atom in the center of the field in the shape of a sphere. As the field of an atom originates from the existence of atom, there is a structure in which they are connected to each other in a way. In such a case, when the atom moves, its field will also move in the same direction. Whatever direction the atom moves, the field will move in the same direction. 

Now, let’s add some features to the field. Imagine that the field is an extremely rigid structure. I mean, let’s imagine it as a perfect structure which doesn’t wiggle like jelly or has flexibility like rubber. It is so rigid that, when we move the atom, it moves in the same way as the outside borders of the field that is at infinite distance.

Let’s give another feature to the field. Imagine that the field can conduct electromagnetic waves in itself. The speed of an electromagnetic wave relative to the field in which it moves is always “c”, i.e. constant. Let’s finish this by making a final addition. The field can direct an electromagnetic wave that is moving in it so that it goes to the center of the field. 

In this way, we obtained a model that is fully compatible with (c+v) (c-v) mathematics. An electromagnetic wave that is released in the field will directly go towards the center of the field. Whatever field it was released in, it will go to the atom that owns that field. Relative to the atom in the center of the field, the speed of the INCOMING electromagnetic wave will always be “c”. 

Now, let’s have a look at the questions that made us give a break in the past. See how many questions have been automatically answered. 

1) How can an electromagnetic wave know its arrival target at the moment of the emission?
2) How is the information that the arrival target is in motion conveyed to the source that emits the electromagnetic wave?
3) How can an electromagnetic wave adjust its speed as “c” relative to its arrival target if the arrival target is in motion relative to the source?
4) How can a source whose frequency is f0 and wavelength λ0 as its factory setting from its manufacture emit wavelengths over different wavelengths?
5) If the questions above can be answered, how is this possible even when there are unbelievable distances –thousands, millions, and even billions of light-years – between the source and the target?

As can be seen, all the questions have been answered, but we can still put a question mark to the fifth question. How is it possible that the length of a field extends to infinity? I will honestly say that the answer to this question is not in (c+v) (c-v) mathematics. I will convey my opinions in this matter in Chapter Four. 

The discussion on “Does (c+v) (c-v) mathematics exist in nature or not?” is now a silly one. It does. Since it does, it must also have a reason. Such a foundation in nature should be described so that (c+v) (c-v) mathematics can be formed. What I tell you here is a product of this effort. After all, I described a model that may provide us with (c+v) (c-v) mathematics here. 

There are two main ideas in this model. Firstly, it is to accept in principle that these structures we call “fields” exist in nature and each is a physical object. When we look at scientific books, articles and study notes, we certainly come across sentences similar to these: “An electromagnetic field is created around a coil through which a current passes.” or “An object charged with electricity generates an electric field around it.” Such sentences are utterly wrong. I’m putting it plain and simple: IT CANNOT GENERATE. You cannot create anything that already exists. Fields already exist. When you have a current pass through a coil, you just activate the fields of atoms (electrons) in the coil that already exist. If you charge an object by giving static electric to it, you just stimulate the fields that the object already has. Fields always exist; it is a natural result of the existence of matter; it is part of it. Fields are real physical objects that always should be dealt with together with matter. Yes, we cannot see it like an object, but we can see its effects clearly; we even built our civilization by making use of it. Fields cannot be formed or created because they always exist. 

I’ll express my second opinion here. I’m making the assumption “A field is in a continuous flow towards its own center and the speed of this flow is “c”.” In such an assumption, electromagnetic wave doesn’t need to have its own speed anymore; it has now turned into a pack of energy. If you put this pack on a field, the pack will mandatorily go to the center of the field, i.e. the atom there, because of the flow of the field. The pack will go to the atom on whose field you put it on. Relative to the atom in the center of the field, the INCOMING speed of the pack is always “c”. Such a setting provides (c+v) (c-v) mathematics without any difficulty. 

Whether it is because of the flow of the field in itself or the speed of the electromagnetic wave itself, the fact that the speed of an electromagnetic wave relative to the field that it is in is “c” is a result that (c+v) (c-v) mathematics indicates. I must make my proposition and step aside at this point. I leave the answers to questions that are difficult to answer such as what is a field, what is it made of, how is its unity with matter ensured to scientists who work or will work on this topic. 

Field principles I propose for Alice Law: 

Electromagnetic waves move in fields. 
The speed of an electromagnetic wave relative to the field that it is in is constant and “c”.
The direction of the movement of electromagnetic waves is always towards the center of the field. 

Return to table of contents

Previous chapter: Fields 

Next chapter:  Thinking with fields in mind